5 Simple Techniques For case when law is silent

5 Simple Techniques For case when law is silent

Blog Article

“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after far they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not imply that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These types of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of past observed.

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It's also a properly-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.

Case files may additionally be accessed from the public access terminals from the clerk’s office of your court where the case was filed. 

competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons having their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to complete absent with the candidature in the petitioner. Read more

The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s get more info inclusion of technological aspects allows for any more comprehensive legal response.

(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August 28th, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government companies in regards to projects that could perhaps pose a public risk. This case is usually noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all future public interest litigation brought before courts for environmental protection.” To cite just one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found while in the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is often a right to life itself.

Any court may possibly look for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe to be a foster child. Although the pair had two young children of their own at home, the social worker didn't tell them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement during the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had youthful children.

In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected to your death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.

Finally, an important contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration through the Court under Article 184 (3), has been setting a precedent which allows for much less complicated access to your public to tactic the superior courts along with the subordinate courts on environment related issues.

The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its prospective to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity of your national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of these changes is important for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.

However, it’s essential to note that the application of your death penalty is subject matter to several legal safeguards and owing process to be certain fair trials.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]